Log in

View Full Version : Crash loads


Chris
June 18th 07, 04:17 PM
Does anyone know what specification the Navy uses to define proper
crash loading of structures in the cargo bay of the aircraft? I know
the numbers 16G's forward, 20G's down, etc., but I'm assuming this is
formally documented in a military or civilian standard. I'm not
having much luck finding it.

cdr[_2_]
June 19th 07, 01:08 AM
"Chris" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Does anyone know what specification the Navy uses to define proper
> crash loading of structures in the cargo bay of the aircraft? I know
> the numbers 16G's forward, 20G's down, etc., but I'm assuming this is
> formally documented in a military or civilian standard. I'm not
> having much luck finding it.

You could start with MIL-A-8865B(AS) "Airplane Strength and Rigidity
Miscellaneous Loads"

Tom Clarke
June 19th 07, 03:28 AM
"Chris" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> Does anyone know what specification the Navy uses to define proper
> crash loading of structures in the cargo bay of the aircraft? I know
> the numbers 16G's forward, 20G's down, etc., but I'm assuming this is
> formally documented in a military or civilian standard. I'm not
> having much luck finding it.
>
I always wondered if they ever found any 20G pilots!

Tom

June 21st 07, 12:35 AM
On Jun 18, 9:17 am, Chris > wrote:
> Does anyone know what specification the Navy uses to define proper
> crash loading of structures in the cargo bay of the aircraft? I know
> the numbers 16G's forward, 20G's down, etc., but I'm assuming this is
> formally documented in a military or civilian standard. I'm not
> having much luck finding it.



Why?......you planning on crashing a plane into something?

Rolf T. Kappe
June 22nd 07, 01:49 AM
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:28:54 -0400, "Tom Clarke"
> wrote:

>"Chris" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>> Does anyone know what specification the Navy uses to define proper
>> crash loading of structures in the cargo bay of the aircraft? I know
>> the numbers 16G's forward, 20G's down, etc., but I'm assuming this is
>> formally documented in a military or civilian standard. I'm not
>> having much luck finding it.
>>
>I always wondered if they ever found any 20G pilots!
>
>Tom
>
You do realize that the average human can take 50+ gs, correct?

--Rolf

Google